top of page
Search

What Is Chain of Title - and Why Every Indie Filmmaker Should Know

  • rothlegal
  • May 17
  • 6 min read

Updated: 4 days ago




By:  Murray A. Roth, Jr., Esq.

5/17/25


When you're knee-deep in developing your indie film—sweating over your script, assembling your cast, and stretching every dollar of your budget—it's easy to overlook one of the most critical pieces of your production puzzle: the Chain of Title.

Yet, without a clean Chain of Title, your film might never see the light of day.


What Is Chain of Title?

In the world of filmmaking, Chain of Title refers to the complete set of legal documents that prove you own (or have licensed) all of the rights necessary to produce, distribute, and monetize your film. It’s essentially the paper trail that tracks the history of ownership and rights associated with your project—from the original idea all the way through to the final cut.


Think of it like the deed history to a house. Before you can sell or mortgage property, you must prove you own it. The same goes for your film.


Why Does Chain of Title Matter?

A clean and complete Chain of Title isn’t just legal busywork—it’s a foundational requirement for moving your film forward. Here's why:


-Securing Financing:  Oftentimes, investors and other types of financiers won’t fund a film unless it’s proven to them that the filmmaker fully owns all rights to what's being made. Banks will always require proof of a clean, detailed Chain of Title, and their lawyers will make sure of it. In fact, the amount of Chain of Title documents required by banks for any type of film financing can be exhausting.


-Distribution:  Distributors will require legal assurance that you have the right to license or sell your film, including all rights to the script and all music or material contained within it. Remember, unless you are embarking on a self-distribution strategy, the distributor is the actual entity that puts the film out for public consumption (known as “publication”). So technically/legally, it’s the one committing infringement if all intellectual rights have not been secured. The distributor is also the one with the “deep pockets” who will most certainly be sued if it comes to that. So proof of a clean Chain of Title is always part of the “deliverables” for distributors.


-Insurance:  Errors and Omissions (E&O) insurance—which protects against legal claims like copyright infringement and defamation—won’t be issued without proof of a clean Chain of Title. And E&O insurers will scour through everything to make sure before issuing a policy.


-Film Festivals & Union Agreements:  Many film festivals often require proof of certain rights as a condition of accepting submissions, and unions (such as SAG-AFTRA) often require similar proof before approving agreements of their members.


What Should Be Included in a Chain of Title?

Here’s a breakdown of the key documents that should be part of any Chain of Title package — and why each matters:


-Entity Formation Documents – If you formed a company (such as a corporation or LLC) specifically to produce the film, it is the legal entity that will own the film’s rights (normally). So, for Chain of Title purposes, you should have and include all documents that prove the entity’s formation and status. These documents show that the production entity exists legally and is in good standing in the State where it was formed.


-Rights to Original Literary Material – These are contracts or licenses proving that you or your production entity has the legal right to use the story, script, book, article, or any underlying work that your film is based upon. This includes purchase agreements and licenses or “work for hire” agreements (if writers were hired to write/contribute to the script). Both are addressed in more detail below.


-Purchase/Assignment Agreements – If a writer, creator, or any prior rights holder transferred their ownership of underlying works (such as a script) to you or your production entity, you’ll need signed agreements documenting each transfer. This ensures that you (or your entity) now hold the rights, not them. And know that if you personally wrote the script before forming a production entity, you still must have a written assignment agreement executed between you personally and your production entity making the transfer legal.


-Option Agreements – If you secured the rights to a story or script through an option (rather than a direct purchase), you must include these agreements in your Chain of Title package. Also to be included are all documents proving that each option was “exercised” and that the purchase price has been paid. These documents confirm that you or your production entity has the current legal status to develop the project, and they will also often outline terms under which your entity can later acquire other rights.


-Work-for-Hire Agreements  – These are the signed contracts with writers, directors, main actors, producers, composers, and other creatives who either wrote or contributed to the story (e.g. a writer’s services agreement). These contracts should all have a clause that clearly states that their services and contributions are “works made for hire.” This is a legal term in copyright law that means you or your production entity—not the individual providing the services—own the creative work and all associated rights. There is specific language that should be used. And it’s very important that these agreements be signed BEFORE the individual begins his/her creative services. Copyright law does not allow a “work for hire” to be signed afterwards with the intent of applying it retroactively. Very important.


-Copyright Registrations – Of course, you must include all official certificates from the U.S. Copyright Office proving that the screenplay, the film (if finished), and any/all underlying or incorporated works are registered with the USCO. This also includes certified recordation documents from the USCO that show any assignments of previously registered works and any other ancillary documents affecting the Chain of Title.


-Chain of Title Affidavit – In many cases, a sworn statement may be required which is signed by a producer (under oath in the presence of a notary) that summarizes the entire ownership history of the film’s rights. This affidavit is not always required, but large distributors, financiers, and insurers often require the same as a final layer of assurance.


Common Pitfalls to Avoid

For Chain of Title, many indie filmmakers commonly run into trouble for the following non-exclusive reasons:


  1. They forget to get signed agreements from all writers or collaborators (either assignments or services contracts containing a “work for hire” clause).


  2. They overlook underlying rights such as music, art, or previously published material. Even a short clip of generic music just a few seconds long will require a music license from those holding the rights.


  3. They use template contracts where the filled-in information is unknowingly done incorrectly (specific party names, specific rights transferred, etc.) thereby rendering the signed contracts useless.


  4. They fail to document transfers of rights clearly and legally which can raise issues and disagreements later over exactly what was transferred.


  5. They fail to register copyrights correctly with the USCO by either a) classifying works incorrectly, b) failing to properly identify who is the "copyright claimant" compared to the "legal author" and vise versa (there can be a difference), c) failing to identify the registered work as a “work for hire” when required, and d) including in the registration the names of those hired to write/contribute to the script as legal authors when copyright law sometimes is to the contrary. These things happen often, and because copyright registration requires correct legal specificity to be binding, substantial problems arise that must be fixed later with the USCO (often at substantial legal cost).


These are just some examples of mishaps that oftentimes occur during the important process of establishing a clean, complete Chain of Title for an independent film. Even if corrected later after discovery, such can raise red flags for financiers, distributors, and/or insurers—and possibly sink your project altogether. To them, such raises the question of:  If incorrect or “sloppy” contracts and incorrect USCO registrations were done for the Chain of Title, what else might have been done incorrectly?


The Bottom Line

If you want your film to make it beyond your hard drive— that is to get initial funding, obtain insurance at affordable rates, land distribution, and reach audiences—your Chain of Title must be airtight. Just about every agreement that you sign—especially those for financing, insurance, and distribution—will require you (or your production entity) to warrant that you fully own (or control) all rights to your film. If it turns out that you don’t (whether you knew about it or not; mistake or otherwise), the deal can be canceled. In some instances, you could even be held liable for damages. Don’t let this happen. Treat your Chain of Title as seriously as your script or your shooting schedule, and keep meticulous records. Your film—and your future deals—depend on it.


This article is provided for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Before taking any action regarding this topic or any other legal issue, always consult an experienced entertainment attorney who can advise on your specific facts, films, and needs.

 
 
 

Comments


© 2016-2025 Murray A. Roth, Jr., Esq.

  • Facebook
bottom of page